A 70-year-old Toronto man has been charged with theft and fraud after allegedly claiming a $1 million prize on a group lottery ticket and keeping it all for himself. According to the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP), the ticket was part of a group play arrangement involving two other people, with the accused claiming the prize money in July (1).
The Ontario Lottery and Gaming Corporation (OLG) conducted a forensic review, and the case was referred to the police — the OPP launched an official investigation in September.
For Canadians who play the lottery as part of a group, whether with co-workers, friends or relatives, the case illustrates how a big win can quickly turn into a legal crisis.
According to police, the man submitted a claim to OLG, saying he was the sole winner of a $1 million prize from a Lotto Max ticket. He received his payment, but a review by the OLG’s forensic investigation unit raised concerns.
The case was referred to the police and their investigation determined that the ticket was part of a group-play arrangement. Police say the winnings should have been shared among three people, not just one. The man now faces charges including theft over $5,000, fraud over $5,000 and possession of property obtained by crime.
OLG released a short statement (2), saying it could not comment further while the case is before the courts. “OLG has a robust process with many levels of scrutiny and transparency in the prize claim process.”
Read more: Here are 5 expenses that Canadians (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you?
Pooling together your money with others in order to buy lottery tickets is a longstanding tradition in Canada. Sometimes these are one-off occurrences, but often a group will buy tickets on a regular basis.
However, if you don’t have a clear agreement in writing about what happens if you win, disputes can escalate quickly.
Miscommunication can be mistaken for fraud. For example if all you have is a verbal arrangement, disagreements become one person’s word against another’s. The case of the Toronto man shows why even small group jackpots should be treated with the same level of seriousness as a shared financial asset.
Source link




